Does Directory Submission Software Work? My Experiment.

SliQ Submitter Plus Directory Submission Software

SliQ Submitter Plus Directory Submission Software *click to enlarge*

Over the years I have gotten conflicting messages from various SEO experts on the topic of directory submissions, ranging from “They’ll help you!” to “They’ll hurt you!” to “They won’t make any difference at all!”.  The industry doesn’t seem to have a consensus on this topic.  I’m not talking about the few directories that are psuedo-blessed by Matt Cutts in his videos (like DMOZ and Yahoo! Directory), but the thousands of cheap or free directories that auto-submission software targets.  I’ve been using the birth of the “Coconut Headphones” website to monitor the growth of its link profile fairly closely, and since it’s just a blog site and not a source of revenue for me (i.e. I had nothing to lose), I decided to try out one of these directory submitters myself.  There are several out there, but the one I chose was SliQ Submitter Plus.  It’s relatively inexpensive, and unlike some other packages, is focused entirely on directory submission (rather than social bookmark submission and so on).

SliQ Submitter Plus has around 2,700 or so directories currently listed in it.  It completely automates the process of submitting to a directory, including entering in the information about the website you’re submitting, your contact information, and the category to suggest for the website.  The category feature is pretty interesting – the software has you manually select categories for the first several directories, and as it submits to other directories you’ve chosen, if it sees the same hierarchy, it can automatically select the right category.  Eventually you build up a set of automatic rules that it applies, in order, to each directory, and submission becomes totally automated (after about 50 or so websites, you shake out most of the categories and it works about 90% of the time).

Captcha Decoding

A *really* neat feature of this software is its support for two captcha-decoding services, Decaptcher and Deathbycaptcha.  These are third-party services that will automatically decode captchas ‘s for you.  The way they do this is, they first attempt to solve the captcha using optical character recognition and various algorithms that have been developed to automatically analyze these.  If they can’t successfully solve it automatically, the captcha is automatically routed off to a human (presumably in China or elsewhere) for manual solving.

You can buy credits on these services and then you’re given an API key you can enter into SliQ Submitter Plus.   These services are pretty cheap; Decaptcher is only $4.00 per thousand decoding attempts.

The Submission Process

So, first I worked with a random set of directories to submit in a semi-automated fashion (essentially manually controlling the process), so SliQ Submitter Plus could learn which categories I wanted to make my submission in.  After it learned a reasonable number of scenarios,  I was able to put the application in full automation mode, and configure it to just skip any directories that had either unfamiliar category hierarchies, or captchas that couldn’t be solved.

It was actually *very fascinating* watching this thing decode captchas, select categories, submit, and move on for directory after directory, totally automatically.  Impressive.

I can’t stress highly enough the importance of hand-selecting the directories, there are some which you can easily tell (just by inspection of the domain name) that you probably don’t want a link from – so-called “bad neighborhood” directories.

Between the semi-automated  submissions (where I solved the captcha myself or selected a category) and the completely automated submissions I selected for this experiment, there were a total of 360 directories.   Most of these directory sites require you to hand-confirm the submission by clicking a link in a confirmation email (of course, they try to sell you further services and so on).   Many will either quietly reject you, or perhaps aren’t even legitimate directories accepting submissions anymore – I suspect some of these are just collecting email addresses.  This part of the process may appear to be somewhat of a hassle,  but opening hundreds of emails and clicking links actually goes pretty quickly.  I would definitely recommend using a separate email account as you will later receive a lot of marketing emails from these directories.

Results

After submitting to 360 directories, I ended up with 39 links from 25 separate sites, at least as far as I can tell by querying Google 3-4 weeks after the submission process – it could be that Google simply hasn’t spidered some of the others, but I tend to think that’s about all I will see results-wise.  So it looks like it’s reasonable to expect a 10% success rate when doing these submissions.

My blog, which was ranking #3 for the phrase “coconut headphones”, is ranking #1 for that as of this posting.  I do not necessarily credit the directory links, there were many other things going on over the past couple of months (my articles have been getting an increasing number of retweets from others, for instance).  My sense though is, at a minimum, the directory submissions did not appear to *hurt* the site from a ranking perspective – and probably helped, at least a little.  Not a very scientific evaluation, but take it as one data point.

Conclusion

For the time involved and the relatively cheap investment,  I have concluded that using directory submission is well worth both the time and cost – just don’t expect it to have huge positive effects on rankings, and use it as only one of ten or twelve different  approaches worth incorporating for a healthy link-building effort.

16 Comments

  1. gwen says:

    All i know is that the internet has various benefits particularly the wider exposure to millions of users it has. This is the reason why more and more business owners are into using the internet to promote their business or websites. If you were looking to promote your business to the internet world, you probably would need the effective directory submission software to submit your site to as many directories as you can.

    please visit my website http://emsbeltreviews.com

  2. Great experiment, Ted! Personal opinion from my own experiences of course – a lot of these smaller, free directories usually have low PA and DA, therefore, they don’t really influence your ranking, however, a large quantity of them could enhance links from diverse domains to your site, ie, helps your overall SEO goals. If you’re looking for directories though, I feel you would find more value submitting your site and business address to industry related sites, which alternatively, show more authority. Thanks for the post! Great read as always!

  3. David says:

    Hi Ted,
    I saw your link to this article on twitter. In the last few days I also had the idea to test the automated submission services. Your results were interesting. I expected already that it does not really help much with the rankings. But I think I’ll still try it with a free software and see for myself.

  4. Karen Madson says:

    Thank you for your article, as the owner of a bookkeeping business seo is pretty new to me and your article laid it out in simple terms.
    Sincerely,
    Karen

  5. Great article! What do you think about article submitters? Are they worth it? Im looking into getting one for article traffic purposes

  6. Dave says:

    I guess you could call me lazy but i usually pay somebody else to do the directory submission for me. You can find reliable people willing to do submit to directories for $5 on eBay.

    As for worry about eyeballing the directories submitted to and potentially having a hired gun submit to “bad neighborhood” directories, I simply don’t buy the whole “good link, bad link” debate because if somebody wanted to ruin a competitor’s search ranking, you could simply use the software you used and submit them to every bad directory out there.

    I personally believe Google just ignores questionable links and doesn’t penalize for them.

  7. Jennifer says:

    Great review of sliq submitter. I actually decided to purchase it after reading it and I’ve just blasted my site – worked great by the looks of it. Now to see it they get approved :)

  8. Mikael Rieck says:

    Nice to see someone finally doing some sort of test on directories. It would have been cool if it had been even more scientific, but I agree with your conclusion that it does seem to have some value.

  9. Ralf says:

    Directory is still working but not as much as it was before. Make sure that the site you are submitting a site to have a good pr.

  10. Free cd keys says:

    Awesome software that sliq submitter. I really like how fast it is.

  11. Mat Bennett says:

    Great to see this topic broached without the usual FUD and rhetoric. Great post.

    My (equally unscientific) tests show some use in directories – although I haven’t used software like Sliq for many years. However I’d definitely say only make it a small part of your overall link profile and balance it against quality sources.

  12. Mike says:

    Good review of Sliq. I purchased and submitted after reading this review. For longtail, low-competition keywords, I see benefits within a couple of days of submission.

  13. thedan1984 says:

    Nice experiment. I haven’t really fiddled with directory submitting because I never saw a “real impact” – there’s maybe 5 or 6 directories I use for local SEO but they are very localized websites and I think they more help associate the domains with the region because of the directory having such a solid/tight theme.

    I’ve yet to do a lot of heavy testing with regional directories but it may make a good follow up post to yours. Maybe I’ll start some plans for more experimenting.

  14. Arif says:

    Mr. Ted
    Thanks a lot for your Very helpful Article I am doing SEO for My Site and I was Unknown about this Soft but Now I know it will work Great.
    Thanks again.

Leave a Reply

Pingbacks & Trackbacks

  1. Most Epic SEO Content of 2011 | Skyrocket SEO - Pingback on 2011/12/13
  2. freebloggertemplatez - Pingback on 2012/02/08