Sorry Rand, Domain Age does matter!

We will seo no page before its timeAre domains like a fine wine, improving with age (from a SERP ranking perspective)? Contrary to what you may have heard previously, the answer is a resounding – YES.

[***Note – this entry was composed a few weeks ago, as part of my process for queuing up sufficient content for this blog.  But today I saw that Rand Fishkin does some debunking of domain age in a Whiteboard Friday today – so I decided to push this posting out – sorry Rand, I must disagree! ***]

First, some background. Google filed a patent application in 1995 which was granted in 2008 titled “Information retrieval based on historical data”. It talks about scoring a document based on the document’s inception date which could be determined in a number of ways.  Two of the inventors names are eye-catching; Matt Cutts (no introduction required), and Monika Henzinger (if you Google her you can see she is an information retrieval/search engine academic researcher from way back, a heavyweight in this discipline).

In paragraph 39, the patent application says “the date that a domain with which a document is registered may be used as an indication of the inception date of the document”.

Matt Cutts refers to this patent and attempts to address the issue in the following video…

…but if you watch it a few times, you’ll notice the following:

1.) He never says “no” (Translation: Yes!)
2.) At 1:27 he says “not to worry that much” (Translation: worry about it a little)
3.) At 1:29 he says “the difference between a domain that’s six months old versus one year old is really not that big at all” (Translation: there is a difference)
4.) At the end he says “The fact is, it’s mostly the quality of your content, and the sort of links that you get as a result of the quality of your content that determine how well you’re going to rank in the search engines” (Translation: ranking is at least a little bit about Domain Age)

Throughout the video there is a lot of rambling about how WHOIS information is somehow difficult to obtain even for a registrar like Google (frankly, a laughable claim – Google practically knows what you had for breakfast this morning, but they have a hard time getting WHOIS information?). Also Matt sort of pooh-poohs domain age because Google has data on when a page was first crawled or when a link to it was first detected anyway. Of course, before a page can exist at all its domain must be registered, by definition, so this angle doesn’t make much sense either.

Well, there is some finally hard data that sets this issue to rest.

Recently, some academics published the result of an extraordinary study. They used Ph.D-level machine learning techniques to essentially create what amounts to their own search engine. They then collected Google Search Engine Results Pages, and then extracted a large number of features from each individual page. They then trained their search engine using Google’s results, and eventually their engine was able to correctly predict 8 of the top 10 Google results about 80% of the time.

In these academics’ resulting paper “How to Improve Your Google Ranking: Myths and Reality“, they actually went over the data and reverse-engineered how important each feature they extracted from the pages was for ranking – and domain age was one of the features they looked at. As the graphs in the paper illustrate, domain age was a little less than 1/5 as important as PageRank, and more important than having the keyword in an H3 tag or in the Meta-Keywords tag (which they found actually mattered slightly, surprisingly).

The paper is based on research done prior to Google’s Caffeine update. However, although Google is constantly tweaking their ranking algorithms, they probably don’t change them radically very often. Most of the improvements Google seems to have been making over the last few years have been oriented around individual search use-cases like travel, local searches, social updates, and so on, rather than broad swaths of overarching changes to all SERPs. So it’s likely that even after the Caffeine update, Domain Age still matters.

Does this mean you should run out and buy an aged domain, and follow some convoluted process to convert it over to your website to ensure Google’s age counter doesn’t get reset? Perhaps. How does one do so? Good question. There is a lot of tinfoil-hat and coconut-headphone stuff out there on this topic, but I have found none of it convincing – and the truly successful people who use this technique probably aren’t talking! If you are reading this and you have any data or even anecdotal evidence in that regard please post a comment – I would really like to dig into that question as well down the road.


  1. Hi Ted,

    I agree with you I think Rand was pretty wrong on this one, I have dealt with many older websites and they are great if they have been utilized effectively for SEO over time. I do not believe if you have a domain from 2008 you can easily beat a 2008 domain. I think giving the wrong message to new SEO’s is not good. But that is the best thing about SEO every one has their own view point, people have different views.

  2. I’m definitely not convinced by Rand’s argument. He only presents theory with no real supporting evidence to back it up. A couple of things my backlink checking seems to support: 1) old reciprocal links still seem to pass link juice; and 2) it requires time for a new site to start ranking well, even if it has a much better link profile than an older site with a bunch of crappy reciprocal links.

  3. Vlad says:

    Hi, great post, but I have a few comments to make. I agree with you when you say that the domain age matters, because the older a website is, the more time it has to obtain trust and authority from Google, it has more time to acquire backlinks, etc. However, I’m not 100% sure that the age itself matters that much, if it does at all.

    I also recently saw a video on SEOmoz in regards to the age of a domain that explains a few things:

  4. Ted Ives says:

    Vlad – yes, that video is the same one I referenced and linked to at the beginning of the posting.

    I don’t agree that domain age is important because of its correlation with the number of backlinks – my point is, I believe Google is actually plugging the domain age number (in days, months, or years) directly into their rank scoring equations.

    It would be great to do a test with near identical domains of different ages with no backlinks – probably easier for the domainer community to test this than most SEOs as finding the right domains to make it a fair test would be challenging, you’d have to own a lot of them.

  5. I was a bit negative on Rands, comments also but then recently I have taken a site developed 3 Months ago to 2nd place on Google for its competitive term despite the sites around us being there for 5+ years and the site at the top spot has been there for 13 years. But I think we will soon go over that also.

    I guess for extremely busy new websites, that are mentioned in the news and gaining totally natural links fast etc etc this rule can apply that domain age no longer matters. But for websites in less competitive niches it would be alot harder to gain rankings.

  6. thomas says:

    Actually, it’s the “continuity of content” rather than age.

    Google can easily score a page based with a historic “usefulness” score. It’s trivial with a large dataset.

    We rank well, even on search terms we no longer actually include, but linked to our topic (immigration law) precisely because we have always stayed to topic.

    I’ve noticed this with a number of our sites. Good quality, over a long run, does yeild results.

  7. Ed Rude says:

    Part of the question of age is: What if my website goes down for a few weeks – when it comes up are my rankings based on what’s new or what’s old?

    I miscalculated the amount of time left on my hosting agreement. One of my websites went down and stayed down for four weeks.

    Once I got it up and running – at first the ranking on the SERPs was the same as before, but then a few days later the pages were ranked even better.

    So it is not even the continuity that matters so much as Google’s understanding of the quality of the content.

    Or perhaps this was the exception that proves the rule.

  8. Wood Railing says:

    Hi Ted, I definitely agree that the age of a domain affects its rankings . However, I don’t feel as if it’s as simple as taking the domain age and plugging it straight into the algo. It seems from work I’ve been doing recently that it is more like old SEO working really well. All those crappy reciprocal links from 2005 add up to make a strong link profile. More tellingly, I’ve seen big brands in these same directories while investigating smaller niches. So these link directories are linking to and also to These links are 5 years old. Therefore, through what seems to be some reverse linke engineering, is gaining cred for being in the same link directory as
    I’ve written a post at seomoz which led me here and would love to have you read it and comment.

  9. VERY TRUE! I’ve gotten great success with my Long Island web design company by purchasing domains that are at LEAST 5+ years old

  10. Compare to other signals that Google uses Domain age is a small bit but never the less it has its own importance.

  11. Great post,
    According to Google Sandbox and Honeymoon effect,every dominwill be in Google Sandox for the first 4-6 months. Then it starts recieving some organic traffic.

  12. june bug says:

    Thanks for the great info. I just started building websites a little more than a month ago – so i am new to SEO. The first page i built was indexed and showed in google results page 2 in 10days. Now no matter what i do it doesnt show on page 1. So in 3 months i should see some improvement right?In the meantime Im writing content and building my social media presence..and hope for the best 😀

  13. それは数年を要したが、中国のブランドは私の提案に従って始めて、よりたぶん私よりも簡単に起こることになっていたことの自然経過を予測するけれども。それは中国人であることを誇りに思うならば、まじめに中国のハイエンドの腕時計をする唯一の方法です。ブランドコピーこの中の1つのフロントランナーは、中国のタイムキーパーと呼ばれる新しいブランドです。欧州に通されて、ブランドの漢字と中国で完全に造られる腕時計の数千ドルのレンジを促進することに取り組んでいます。しかし、彼らの価格はまだ少し高を比較することができるものに数千ドルを得ます。

  14. の原則は原則の詩と経済学の原則で、第2の「等価。ここでは、まあposited実用方程式の間です。「いい」、「次」と「既成事実」。PAS(良いと深刻な自制、自制、自制)。」準配備本もろくて弱い経済方程式、探求の境界の間の過程と製品、成功と失敗、天才と。ロレックス 時計コピー「なくて、私達のここだけの話しましょう、私達に引き続き気づいた、このタイプの反復件1。

  15. リードファッションのアメリカ有名な腕時計ブランドTIMEX(タイメックス)は2008年12月8日から14日、北京で君がデパートの2階に1週間の巡回展示活動を展開。スーパーコピー時計その時、消費者を味わうことができるだけではなくTIMEX(タイメックス)新しいブランドイメージにより、率先して目を発売のファッションSLシリーズのバラ金全自動機械表と、非常にTIMEX(タイメックス)の特色のアウトドアシリーズの潮汐温度羅針盤表やファッションTシリーズの多機能クロノパンパン親密接触、感じTIMEX(タイメックス)演繹の素晴らしい生活。また、「時を前に、私の人生の感想」写真募集イベントも展示会現場に幕を開け、ごとに1つの消費者も機会があって解釈を写真で自分の中の「時前」を分かち合い、自分の人生の感想。

  16. Q計画の中心要素は、オーデマピゲ時計工場が司会のQ国際賞授与対象は保護児童権益側は重大な貢献の有名人や社会機構。新しいMillenaryミレニアムクインシージョーンズ腕時計の一部販売収入はクインシージョーンズ基金会に寄付する。オーデマピゲ表グループCEOの莫菲利(フィリップ・Merk)さんは「クインシージョーンズは天才芸術家、プロデューサー、さらにはまず1位の人は広い心を持っている。ブルガリ偽物彼はいろいろな困難を克服して育成の偉大な事業に感動し、彼の高貴な品質は恐れ入っ、私たちに人生の中の重要な一課は、完璧な芸芸術」と情熱、同様の哲学はこの伝奇音楽人とオーデマピゲ表ほど係がきつい。オーデマピゲ135年通りで休まないの努力の成果を壮大タブ史、クインシージョーンズも数十年一日のように待ってた世界の流行音楽史をつくる。MILLENARYミレニアムクインシージョーンズ(Quincyジョーンズ新しい)限定時計演繹ミレニアム横楕円形のケースにこの素晴らしいミュージシャンを演じるその特色に富んだオーデマピゲ新しい現代Millenaryミレニアムシリーズの特徴をマークし、黒鋼の個性豊かな横楕円形のケース。表面のようなケースは多分霧中間部分面研磨磨き;別のいくつかの表面表圏や表耳正面は多分亮面研磨に磨きをかけて、令其のレイヤー感のほかヘルニア。スーパーコピーケースデザイン精細には縦横に霧面研磨磨きをセイコー飾り。亮面バフ磨きのキャップを刻んでクインシージョーンズと署名のMillenary Quincyジョーンズ–リミテッドEdition文字が、貴重な表項で世界限定500発行。ミレニアムクインシージョーンズ腕時計配備黒革バンド、組み合わせとケースの呼応を黒鋼APと折り畳み表ボタン。ミレニアムクインシージョーンズ腕時計を踏襲して2000シリーズ特有のオフセット文字盤も目利き一目で見分けるその係のマーク名門の出。文字盤外縁描き出して繊細なアウトコース、美しい黒の表面に向けては小が大のプラチナローマ数字に標を連想させるニューヨークジャズクラブで徹夜の音楽演奏。ブランドコピーミレニアムクインシージョーンズ腕時計黒を基調とし、その豊富な深さのレベルを作成するために運用出動人心の琴線の対比、工夫をこらした鍵盤柄飾りをめぐる時表示文字盤、生き生きとした鍵盤弾くよう現場ジャズのリズムがありありと表面の上に、軽快。

  17. 当店は海外安心と信頼のスーパーコピーブライトリング、代引き店です.正規品と同等品質のシャネル コピー代引き,品質が秀逸,値段が激安!ブライトリングコピー,代引きなどの商品や情報が満載!全商品写真は100%実物撮影です! お客様の満足度は業界No.1です!スーパーコピー時計,時計コピー ,ブランド時計コピー販売(n級品)店舗 ブランド腕時計(ロレックス,ブライトリング,タグホイヤー,オメガ,ガガミラノなど)の最新 情報やイベントを紹介する正規販売店と腕時計コピーの専門サイトです。当店はロレックスやパテックフィリップなどの新品スーパーコピー時計の販売と。

  18. その独特の色で、この時計をと。ラバーバンド間の次のバックルでバラの粉金材質を表出この時計の現代感や運動質感。この制作精密、大胆なデザインの腕時計は全てでスイス手作りをはぐくみ、ブルガリ「求め続けた斬新な材質ベストコンビ」の主旨を一貫して、指先に装着者尊い気質。

  19. 今から100年以上前の1910年、パリのカンボンストリートに最初の店がオープン。カンボンラインはそのストリートの名に由来して命名されたシャネルの名コレクション。潔いCCマークはこのコレクションならでは。最もエルメスらしいアイテムが女の人のための高級なバッグ。「ケリー」バッグや個性的な女優にちなんだ「バーキン」などから「ブランドの中のブランド」と称賛され、世界中の人々から注目されるブランドといっても過言ではない。バーバリーを語る上で外せないのはやっぱりチェック柄の製品。使いやすいすっきりとしたデザインにより、バッグやウォレットなどをメインにメンズもレディースもどちらも愛されている。エルメス製のエルメスバッグ コピーをネットの通販ショップで比べることから始めましょう。

  20. 北斗衛星時計を採用し、中国が自主開発した北斗衛星ナビゲーションシステムの2世代の時報信号を時報、北斗衛星に覆われた範囲内で、すべての時計分秒違わない、時間精度で制御コンマ1秒以内に。北斗衛星時計は「1、2、3を測るかも」など何項のハイテク機能、即ち、衛星信号時刻合わせ、校正時計時間;二定、すなわち指向、位置決め、出力経緯度、高度の座標、地図区枚コード;三測、すなわち、高さを測る、温度を測る測気圧。BOTTEGA VENETA財布コピー未来の北斗衛星の時計を持ってショートメッセージ通信機能を使用することができ、この機能はユーザーの緊急援助、ときに、野外旅行者やアウトドア者に危険が警察に助けを求めに限り、腕時計のSOSキーをすることで、自分の位置情報や救難信号衛星で、事前設定の端末に送信して。世界の四大衛星ナビゲーションシステムは、中国の北斗衛星ナビゲーションシステムを備えているこの機能。

  21. クロノグラフの完全な12時間を測定するbiコンパックスクロノグラフである。腕時計を持って秒針が動作していないことを意味します、あなたはすべての時間、クロノグラフ機能を持っていない限り。ダイヤルは、下位ダイヤルを取り入れるために再設計されました、そして最終的には完全に対称形である。カルティエの移動分スケールリングアウトがフランジリングを以前に裸の毛羽仕上げの金属仕上げで。この時計の外観と変化はより大きく見え、ダイヤルすることの効果があります。ダイヤルは現在より大きいことが、より個別のアワーマーカー、半分のローマ数字と半分のバトンマーカーの形を再び取るカリフォルニアダイヤル?のこのカルティエのバージョンです)。あなたはダイヤルの上に装飾の同じタイプがあります、しかし、すべて感じの接地に対称形のデザインを与えられます。 カルティエ 時計コピー の「拡張」と日付ウインドウを保持したが、それは6時に移動しました。すべてのすべてで、私はダイヤルの多くが好きです、しかし、1つのカルティエは、少しあまりに短される主の手に設計さを感じます。

  22. グッチ スーパーコピー非常に優美かつ独特で、ずっと優雅な姿で潮流の最高峰に立って、流行に引率して 豪華スーパーコピーブランドお楽しみください!弊社は個性あふれるブランドコピー、すばらしい デザインと高品質を兼ね備えるスーパーコピーバッグ、優雅の魅力があるのスーパーコピー財布など人気商品が続々入荷!

  23. 今年は実力で優勝したチームはたくさん本を含め、アイルランド隊。ヨーロッパツアー第2位の罗里・マイクロイ(Rory McIlroy)が今年は格莱姆・麦克道尔(Graeme McDowell)コンビ代表アイルランド出陣。20歳の罗里・マイクロイは現在、世界ランキング10位。

Leave a Reply

Pingbacks & Trackbacks

  1. » Is Domain Age a Significant Factor in Website Rankings? – A SPN Exclusive Article - Pingback on 2011/12/28
  2. Domain Age and SEO: The Ongoing Debate | HigherVisibility - Pingback on 2012/02/21
  3. Is Domain Age a Significant Factor in Website Rankings? – A SPN Exclusive Article | SiteProNews: Webmaster News & Resources - Pingback on 2013/04/01
  4. Google’s Secret Ranking Algorithm Exposed | - Pingback on 2015/01/13